The Flaky Wanderer

@flakywanderer.bsky.social

An upcoming 'tiel 'tuber exploring some fresh air. Highly sussy, 18+ only

Starting to see "they don't deserve good faith" reactions to this and the problem I have with that is we have examples of actual good faith negotiations that landed tens of millions of investment into local communities and, in at least one instance, residents responded by voting everyone out.

Jeremy Diamond ☕️@dmnd.me · 16h ago

First, and most importantly, anti-data center folks refuse to believe data center developers and tech companies engage in good faith. They have staked out a purely reactionary position. Negotiation is useless. Just reject everything by default. They're playing this as Always Defect.

I find it frustrating, personally, when anti-data center organizers say that the job creation is a myth. Because I think that 500 six-figure jobs, for folks who go through apprenticeships but maybe don’t need college degrees, that last two to six years — that’s enough time to build a family, that’s enough time to buy a home. I think it’s supermeaningful. And when I talk to technicians, when I talk to workers, clearly it was extremely meaningful work.

One of the things that was the most surprising to me, when I talked to data center activists, was that they responded to so many of the pro arguments with: I don’t believe them.

So this company says that they are going to treat the water with chemicals in it so that it doesn’t flow into the lakes. People would say: I don’t believe them. I don’t think they can do it.

First, and most importantly, anti-data center folks refuse to believe data center developers and tech companies engage in good faith. They have staked out a purely reactionary position. Negotiation is useless. Just reject everything by default. They're playing this as Always Defect.

I find it frustrating, personally, when anti-data center organizers say that the job creation is a myth. Because I think that 500 six-figure jobs, for folks who go through apprenticeships but maybe don’t need college degrees, that last two to six years — that’s enough time to build a family, that’s enough time to buy a home. I think it’s supermeaningful. And when I talk to technicians, when I talk to workers, clearly it was extremely meaningful work.

One of the things that was the most surprising to me, when I talked to data center activists, was that they responded to so many of the pro arguments with: I don’t believe them.

So this company says that they are going to treat the water with chemicals in it so that it doesn’t flow into the lakes. People would say: I don’t believe them. I don’t think they can do it.Companies say: We are going to create 500 jobs, and some of these will stick around after the data center is built. People just said: I don’t believe them.

It was really clear to me that data centers are showing up in an environment of extremely low trust in both governments and in corporations, to the extent where the pro arguments almost do not land because people just aren’t interested in anything an outside tech company is going to tell them. They say: They have big public relations teams. They can say whatever they want.

Hello. If you struggle with maladaptive overachievement, and anxiety about productivity, and you experience relief at the sensation of productivity and difficulty regulating your behavior around demands for you to be productive, that doesn't make you a bad person, and that is not addiction.

“Michigan is a hotbed of resistance to renewable energy projects. A 2025 review ranks it as the state with the largest number of local restrictions: More than 60 local governments in Michigan passed ordinances, moratoriums, or other restrictions on wind and solar development between 2011 and 2024.”

WIRED@wired.com · 8h ago

Activist and grassroots organizer Will Lawrence has won the Democratic primary election in Michigan’s 7th Congressional District, with a campaign focused on data centers’ regulation and demanding accountability for big tech and AI companies. www.wired.com/story/anti-d...

I feel like people who previously focused on being anti-surveillance have really lost the plot on ai by pretending that there isn’t demand for it rather than focusing on its role in current & future police states

the number of folks who jumped to the worst possible interpretation of toni’s interview clips is quite concerning, too many people have let social media and purity culture just melt their brains… it’s one of the most gratuitous & gross examples of toxic online discourse culture i’ve seen in awhile

Toni Schneider@toni.bsky.team · yesterday

Thanks. Yes, that's what I was trying to say, but took too long to get there. Our politics community is strong, and I'd love for us to expand into new communities. Science and sports have already taken off. Birding, gardening, K-pop, we're open to all (except nazis and jerks).

The conversation about AI in health stuff is always about the risks of patients using AI. I'm more worried about possibilities like every appointment gets inspected by an insurance company in detail so that if a patient uses the slightly wrong words about something their care is denied.

the best vibe coders are not "vibe coding" but have basically a 100% designed spec from the start (incl. with some idea of a testing suite) and the ai is basically just doing implementation work. that is to say, they're PMs. the thing is: most PMs are bad at being PMs, and so are most coders.

A horseshoe crab in a freshwater environment@mienaiknife.bsky.social · 2d ago

I suspect that good designers make good vibecoders cuz they can make up for skills that LLMs lack. Such a person can turn a design into a functioning prototype even if the backend isn't great

it seems bad that any effort to “make bluesky less of a liberal echo chamber” is seen as inviting nazis or even just right wingers to the platform when it probably more accurately means completely unrelated things like cultivating and strengthening the sports community with integrated features

my big takeaway from the Hank Green thing is to note how incoherent the entire discourse is there are categories of computing which are Pure, and which Hank is free to use but other categories of computing which Hank cannot use if a data center hosts the algorithm that promotes his video, fine…

Did not expect Hank Green AI discourse to morph into “he shouldn’t have called the feeling of pleasure/reward at the sense of having accomplished something dopamine”

Ah, OK, I get this. I think people perceive using an LLM as having long conversations with something that's like a person, but which is flattering and deferential. And some models *do* do that, and that makes plenty of people insane, but rarely anyone who like, uses them for work.

Kate Holzemer@katebits.bsky.social · 2d ago

Another thought: in his statement, Hank Green expressed quite a lot of shame about the "dopamine hit" he gets from using AI. As a non-AI user I don't really know what he's referring to here. Is the AI voice flattering him while also doing his job (presumably poorly)? Because that's big weird.

Australia’s eSafety commissioner buried a report (released Friday afternoon) that shows the under 16 social media ban didn’t tangibly reduce teen social media use, and also resulted in parents tuning out of kids usage. We traded our privacy for no reason. theconversation.com/more-than-80...

More than 80% of kids still using social media despite ban, new eSafety report finds

The report provides more evidence Australia’s world-leading social media ban isn’t going to plan.

theconversation.com

i’m sorry to be so blunt and harsh about this, but i’m deeply tired of seeing myself and my friends/colleagues be harassed by anti-AI people behaving like foolish petulant children on a purity crusade while they themselves are deeply deeply unfathomably unpure

I don't think this is necessarily a monocausal thing, but we need to confront that "slop" (talking way more broadly than AI here) is popular because a lot of people like it, not because it's being "shoved down your throat"

Max Dubler 🏳️‍🌈@maxdubler.com · 3d ago

I think my most genuinely unpopular take is that a widely held and genuine consumer preference for cheaper, lower-quality goods, not private equity, is driving the decline in quality of consumer goods like clothing and housewares.

This isn't even like, conspiracism or historical revisionism or anything, I was literally there as this was happening and people at the time were like, "Wow what an obvious fucking con, this sucks," and it's insane to me that that didn't like, stick around in more people's heads.

it's me 🫠@thayet.net · 3d ago

there were definitely early focused efforts to shift public opinion but they were more focused on copyright maximalism. karla ortiz raised ~200k from small artist communities for copyright lobbyists specifically, for example, and popularized a lot of that sentiment/fears in those spaces.

plagiarism is such a funny idea to me, like it's so "we have assignments and grades" coded. like, i was trying to figure out what to make for dinner, and i saw the neighbor making chicken, and now i can't make chicken because i don't want to copy them

I need to underline how egregious this is, because these communities are full of fandom artists, including ones that make an actual living doing art pieces of other peoples' IP. it's "I didn't think Mickey Mouse would eat MY face" meets "temporarily embarrassed vivziepop" to devastating results

it was extremely obvious to anyone paying attention that every single one of these "artist alliance" groups in '22-23 were only serving the interests of major IP holders, many tried to call this out, but the fears of young artists who are already often impoverished are not difficult to exploit.