Michael

@fleerultra.bsky.social

History's most successful legal podcaster, co-host of 5-4 pod. He/Him @fivefourpod.bsky.social

if establishment candidates want to start winning primaries again all you have to do is say that rich people have too much money and that youll prosecute trump admin staffers and republicans that have broken the law

The more progressive candidate won the Democratic Senate nomination, and progressives (along with anyone else who likes El-Sayed) being happy with that is perfectly reasonable. The margin he won by matters little, and there’s a much bigger, much higher stakes fight happening now.

This week’s premium episode is a freewheeling discussion touching on whether Trump can steal the midterms, why elite liberal lawyers are representing the demons at Kalshi, and whether SCOTUSblog is headed to ruin.

Gambling Away the Future: Kalshi, SCOTUSBlog, and Trump’s Bet on the Midterms | 5-4

Peter, Rhiannon, and Michael take a break from case law to discuss the possibility of stolen midterms, the evil lawyers defending Kalshi and

patreon.com

It's also INCREDIBLY DUMB. Often the key to swing-state success is the sense that a politician isn't bound to one party, that they think for themselves, that they're willing to express disapproval of both sides. By maintaining a broadly left-of-center coalition, you give them space to do that.

Here's what drives me crazy about this: It's literally been the guiding philosophy of the entire Democratic leadership for 30 years! Build the entire party around the platform that will appeal to swing districts. It's barely even repackaged! Why does she keep acting like it's "her" theory?!

Parker Molloy@parkermolloy.com · 3d ago

I really hate Elissa Slotkin's patronizing "my theory of the case is that what works in the middle of the country will work on the coasts, but not the other way around" shit. It's one of her canned lines that she uses in her eventual attempt to run for president.

Elissa Slotkin • @ElissaSlotkin
X.com
Here's my theory of the case: If Democrats can figure out how to win in the middle of the country, we can make it work everywhere else. But what works on the coasts does not automatically work in Michigan, in lowa, in Ohio. So we've got to figure out the middle first.
That is why I have been spending time in the middle of the country, in purple and red places. I've been talking with folks who voted for Trump about how they view things and what they're looking for in new Democratic leaders.
And I want to say something about the Democrats organizing in tough places.
These are people doing the hard work in red places, being good Democrats when it's hard. It is easy to show up where everyone already agrees with you. It is something else to show up where they don't, and do it anyway, because you believe it matters.
I believe it matters. And I am going to keep showing up in those places. I hope you will too.

Not the most important thing here, but why don't NC, SC, GA, FL count as "the coasts." All four states are on the coast. TX, LA, MS, AL are coastal states too, but the southeast states are on a main ocean coast. Looks like just another way to say red/rural = real & good; blue/urban = fake & bad.

Parker Molloy@parkermolloy.com · 3d ago

I really hate Elissa Slotkin's patronizing "my theory of the case is that what works in the middle of the country will work on the coasts, but not the other way around" shit. It's one of her canned lines that she uses in her eventual attempt to run for president.

Elissa Slotkin • @ElissaSlotkin
X.com
Here's my theory of the case: If Democrats can figure out how to win in the middle of the country, we can make it work everywhere else. But what works on the coasts does not automatically work in Michigan, in lowa, in Ohio. So we've got to figure out the middle first.
That is why I have been spending time in the middle of the country, in purple and red places. I've been talking with folks who voted for Trump about how they view things and what they're looking for in new Democratic leaders.
And I want to say something about the Democrats organizing in tough places.
These are people doing the hard work in red places, being good Democrats when it's hard. It is easy to show up where everyone already agrees with you. It is something else to show up where they don't, and do it anyway, because you believe it matters.
I believe it matters. And I am going to keep showing up in those places. I hope you will too.

sauced tiger woods: fuuuuuck im so messed up its over for me. i need to call trump it's fucking over hammered tony romo, laying horizontally on your couch; i can drink 15 of these and feel fine you know. i love when bugs bunny dresses like a girl hahaha

because of a weird quirk of physics (time runs linearly, and in only one direction) Sting’s 2000 hit song Desert Rose is NOT actually on Pure Moods Vols I or II

you gotta think at least some of the people making front facing videos or little zines or whatever talking up their expertise and shitting on Nolan’s The Odyssey are just clout chasing

chili crisp and chinese chili oil have become super popular in the last few years but did you know that mexicans also have a chili oil and it's fucking delicious? might make some salsa macha in the next few days. watch this space for updates!

All the Fauci stuff is a modern day version of the POW/MIA stuff after Vietnam - a way to try to rewrite the history of a huge failure of conservative ideology to be instead a story about how liberals and foreigners stabbed us in the back.

as a straight dude I agree too. it's evidence of a weak will and/or poor attachment to good values, and we've all got LGBT friends or family. more practically I've seen way too many people go batshit fucking crazy down the transphobia waterslide

Max Dubler 🏳️‍🌈@maxdubler.com · 7d ago

Squishiness on trans rights is a dealbreaker for me because (a) it’s a straightforward issue of personal freedom and bodily autonomy much like abortion, and (b) the right is obviously coming after us cis gays next.

setting aside data centers, environmental concerns, any sci-fi/fantasy AI-apocalypse concerns, and concerns about built in bigotry or using AI for evil ends like drone targeting; discounting all that, i'd be for banning LLMs just based on lazy people overusing them and it making those people stupid