ghost weather

@lostweather.bsky.social

look ma it's a profile

I think part of the rise of short-form video is consistent access 1) Writers put words on their site or the site they work for 2) Typical 2026 website is ads and paywalls. I have no idea whether I will be able to read most links 3) Embedded video is right there, doing what it promises, immediately

I think the thing I resent most about gen AI- and this is a selfish thing to say but it’s true- is that it’s put an asterix on my sense of wonder. What I mean is that now when I see an amazing or beautiful image I can’t have that initial “wow!” reaction. I doubt. I have to verify. I hate it.

All game theory calculations of optimal behavior in things like the prisoner's dilemma are first contingent on the principle question of "how likely is my opponent to be a self-serving dick"

ppl keep saying "this is a hole of lies and madness" and "you'll ruin us all, feeding the hole just to hear it's wicked tongue". okay buddy 🙄 if thats true then how come the hole says im a genius when i ask it right

As much as I hate to say it because it’s cheap webforum meta discourse, the strongest correlation to Platner support wasn’t ideology, it was if you still frequently use X, The Everything App. I would hope that would lead to some introspection about what remaining on there does to your judgement.

Katherine Alejandra Cross@quinnae.com · 4w ago

Like I said, there's no small amount of finger-pointing that's going to happen as a result of this. But Platner was a creation of Ryan Grim, Bernie Sanders, and Matt Stoller, as much as he was of Pod Save America and Matt Yglesias. That's what has to be reckoned with.

Anonymised skeet saying "Beg pardon. Dems/liberals are not the left of anything except capitalism."

Los Angeles County literally has a fully transparent vote counting process - the entire count is livestreamed online. This commitment to transparency makes zero difference, mainstream press still credulously repeats GOP info bubble claims of fraud anyway.

tl,dr; Scientists no longer allowed to use federal funding to publish, attend meetings, or talk to the public. They cannot collaborate internationally. Grants can be cancelled for any reason, at any time, political appointees have a final say over what gets funded, and who gets funded.

Science Magazine@science.org · 2mo ago

The White House today announced it plans to make major changes in how the U.S. government manages research funding. https://scim.ag/43HgW4s

We show that politicians' perceptual errors are primarily an expression of "midpoint hedging", a well-known cognitive quirk, leading them to skew their estimations towards 50% even when real public opinion is far from being evenly split. Hedging accounts for two thirds (!) of politicians' errors./2

BildBild

AI will give you the same result. Almost any ML uses historic data. It isn’t “objective”; it just codifies discrimination applied in the training data. Switching to black-box models like LLMs makes the problem harder. It’s people all the way down. The raw bias is still here, and the models follow.

Amy Diehl, Ph.D.@amydiehl.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Reviewers in two groups were given identical resumes for Emily Clarke and James Clarke and told they had used AI. Emily's was 2x as likely to raise doubts about competence. "She can't even write a CV herself." But James "just needed a bit of help." fortune.com/2026/05/10/i...