Every time you see a meltdown remember that Chuck Schumer got over it in four hours
⚠️ Democrats in array: Schumer, Gillibrand, and Whitmer coalesce behind El-Sayed
r_ephemeral
@rephemeral.bsky.social
“Everyone knows that in modern communication, messages compete for attention and cancel each other out. And that they are picked out for reasons that need have nothing to do with their truth.” —Bernard Williams
Every time you see a meltdown remember that Chuck Schumer got over it in four hours
⚠️ Democrats in array: Schumer, Gillibrand, and Whitmer coalesce behind El-Sayed
Right wing Twitter has basically become a form of soap opera fandom for fascists. Did you hear who had a nasty falling out? Did you hear who is secretly gay? Did you hear who threatened to kill who? Be sure to tune in tomorrow!
I will reiterate: Christians in the West evangelize in public for the same reason men catcall. Neither is trying to persuade you; both are reminding you that the public sphere belongs to them and you exist in it at their sufferance.
the problem here isn't military, it's the way the military was used. what was the desired outcome? could that be achieved by long-range strike alone? (answer to the first question is a series of question marks, answer to the second is "no")
People need to step back and understand what they are seeing. After a few months of war, the USA is running out of munitions and options fighting a country with no air force, no navy and a damaged infrastructure. US decline is real and self-inflicted.
you know its the atlantic when questions are (1) framed as entirely innocent philosophical hypotheticals but (2) also bravely iconoclastic truth-telling yet stand (3) entirely divorced from reality and (4) affirm the worst impulses while (5) coinciding with programs of true political evil
It's trivially easy to throw out the names of participants in these processes—social movements, civil society, interest groups, political parties, media. But there's no theory I'm aware of that orders their interactions, enumerates their motives, or traces issues' developmental stages.
The only real reason to find it implausible he’d attempt this is “C’mon, this is America, we don’t do that here,” which has thus far been an absolutely worthless heuristic for predicting Trump’s actions.
“public conversation about children and technology focuses on regulating how long children themselves spend in front of screens. Our results show that this framing is incomplete… When adults engage more with the internet…quality and quantity of…interactions with young children is likely to decline”
The rollout of high speed internet in Uruguay worsended early childhood development. But not because the kids spent too much time in front of screens, because the parents did. cepr.org/voxeu/column...
This keeps happening, the conflation of people disapproving of Dems being too weak and unprincipled with disapproving of Dems for being too leftwing. This is part of how a lot of Gen Z distrust for Dems gets recast into Gen Z being rightwing
Insofar as US swing voters think the Democrats are "out of step" with them on climate change, the vast majority say that is because Democrats are "not fighting hard enough/need to do more." Yes, really. 5/n
JKR and her new org apparently helped get the new Amnesty International report on how TERF organizations destroy lives taken down from their site. Well, guess what? The Streisand Effect is real. Here's the entire report in a thread. Read it. Share it.
Amnesty International put out a major report documenting the influence of UK based anti trans gender critical organizations and their funding. Within hours, GC groups threatened defamation lawsuits and Amnesty was forced to pull it down. Proving the point they're anti rights. Anyways, here it is.
Bob Inglis saw what was animating GOP elites & voters over a decade and a half ago, as he lost his primary by over 30 points to Trey Gowdy www.motherjones.com/politics/201...
The fossil fuel industry's successful 2010 primary of pro-climate Republican Bob Inglis scared the shit out of the rest of the caucus
you may have seen this already, but...becoming an independent pundit in the substack space creates massive financial incentives to present yourself as a lone truth teller defying a benighted and biased establishment.
It also has the side effect of punishing Democrats for having moral standards and giving a shit. In our current information and political environment, decency is an anchor.
Interesting bit from the new AP-NORC poll: Favorability among Jewish Americans: D. Trump: -41 J. Shapiro: +20 Z. Mamdani: +5 B. Netanyahu: -27 apnorc.org/projects/dem...
‘Polarization’ has become the master concept for diagnosing our current democratic crisis. But this is not polarization. It is the radicalization of the political right. By misdiagnosing it, we risk becoming complicit in the crisis. 🧵 Just out in Perspectives on Politics doi.org/10.1017/S153...
“moi, j’ai les mains sales. jusqu’au coudes. je les ai plongées dans la merde et le sang” —Sartre
"We know how to play dirty football too" Kylian Mbappé's translated interview
Considering there are 500,000 NCAA athletes and <10 of them are trans, and not all athletes are on scholarship, I'd say your daughter is more likely to be struck by a meteor than lose out to a trans girl on a scholarship.
You may not think it is persuasive, but it is driven by research showing that headline wording affects news perception. This actually does matter, even if you don’t want it to. doi.org/10.1073/pnas...
PNAS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
doi.org
Deterrence works by making the cost uncertainly high. Coercion teaches the adversary exactly what costs they face and allows them to take control of the transaction by choosing to pay the price when that price is suitable. Trump surrendered deterrence for bravado.
The main defense for the archipelago of US Gulf bases was deterrence. Iran (or whoever) won’t fire, except maybe small and symbolic, because if they do then the US will unleash massive strikes. Except Trump did that unprovoked, so Iran didn’t hold back. (Also, insufficient US air defense on land.)
Someday I want to see a really well reported story from the Iranian side on how they managed to systematically destroy the entire US military base archipelago America had built and relied on for decades, and why the US couldn’t protect them. We kind of shrug and move on but it’s astonishing.
The great American state fair being stupid Trump bullshit does legit make me sad, if I’m being honest. A lot of the 250 stuff does. This could have been a really cool and special thing and literally any normal president would have pulled it off.
still thinking about that Goldman Sachs “analysis” that predicted we would be at 120% of normal traffic in the strait of Hormuz by now
Center for Economic Policy Research has shown a person's politics are never the same after being exposed to Elon Musk's black box algorithm. Propagandizing the world is the only thing he's good at. cepr.org/voxeu/column...
Once you get a friend-enemy politics rolling—once mutual expectations are aligned around doing politics in that mode—enemies must & will be found, no matter how marginal, inoffensive, or defenseless. Their persecution will become the routine business of more and more serious political actors.
was looking at X to check something and uh, yeah, i really don't think the next couple of years are going to be great
I’d replace “and yet” here with “therefore, as expected”
If you ask a MAGA acolyte when was the era of American greatness before colleges became engines of liberal indoctrination, they'd likely identify the late 1950s or early 1960s as such a golden age. But even then, the conservative narrative of victimization was exactly the same.
This needs the @shteyngart.bsky.social treatment, almost a prequel to Vera
Do we have a Great American Novel about an aging pundit who loses their mojo and can’t admit it? Seems like a pretty load-bearing but under explored cultural pillar. Commentators I think are more interesting in this vein than athletes or movie stars