Shana Gadarian

@sgadarian.bsky.social

Professor, Political Science | Syracuse University, Maxwell School | American politics, political psychology | Co-author of Anxious Politics and Pandemic Politics

NEW: Missouri voters have rejected Amendment 4, which Republicans had passed to make citizen-initiated constitutional amendments effectively impossible. It would have required initiatives to pass in every congressional district—not just statewide—giving the overwhelmingly red districts a veto

I usually try to get as many answers as I can from a website or chatbot and when needed, I'll call a company. My experiences lately have made me never want to talk to anyone ever again or ever use a website. Why is everything so bad lately?

OUT TODAY! 🥳 A straightforward, non-technical guide to thinking like a quantitative social scientist. Written for students, journalists, and curious citizens. A lot of thought and heart went into this. I genuinely hope folks enjoy it!

BildBild

Thrilled to share my new article with @emilythorson.bsky.social has been published @jhppl.bsky.social. While we found null effects of healthcare experiences on policy attitudes, it’s worth considering how this may shift as negative insurance experiences become more salient in public discourse.

Emily Thorson@emilythorson.bsky.social · 2d ago

New article with former SU grad student @emmadreher.bsky.social: read.dukeupress.edu/jhppl/articl.... We randomly assign people to recall in detail either interactions with their doctors or interactions with their insurance providers, and find no effect of either on health policy attitudes.

🚨New article alert🚨 new experimental work from @supolisci prof @emilythorson.bsky.social & SU PhD alum @emmadreher.bsky.social on the effect of recalled doctor experience on health policy attitudes.

Emily Thorson@emilythorson.bsky.social · 2d ago

New article with former SU grad student @emmadreher.bsky.social: read.dukeupress.edu/jhppl/articl.... We randomly assign people to recall in detail either interactions with their doctors or interactions with their insurance providers, and find no effect of either on health policy attitudes.

I do not care for the smol bean-ing of policy. A policy can be well intentioned but a bad idea because of the tradeoffs involved which is why assessing those tradeoffs is important. It's not bad to point that out.

Went to see Hadestown at the movies last night. It's a proshot of a live performance in London. It's mostly the original cast members and it was produced beautifully. You can feel the energy of the live audience and the filming wasn't distracting. Totally worth it.

Americans have more confidence in higher education than in big tech companies, and the gap is growing rather than shrinking. The higher ed-doomsday pundits need to get on board with the real vibe shift in public trust that is happening right now.

BildBild
Mark Copelovitch@mcopelov.bsky.social · last wk.

I look forward to all the reports & coverage about all of the internal problems & mistakes of all of these other institutions, in the same way that universities are constantly blamed (& blaming themselves) for “declining trust.” “Compared to what?” news.gallup.com/poll/712436/...

"DOE accepts that the inclusion of grants in the October notice tranche was based solely on the political identity of the grant recipient's state, i.e., whether the recipient's location and/or place of performance was in a Blue State or a non-Blue State."

Ruben Rabasa in ITYSL: He Admit It!

ALT: Ruben Rabasa in ITYSL: He Admit It!

static.klipy.com

tony romm@tonyromm.bsky.social · 2w ago

It's part of a major federal court case over those cancelations. Here's what the government admitted as part of a process meant to avoid discovery (and perhaps spare it from sharing more damaging records):

NEW: In a stunning admission, the Trump administration admitted in court documents that it canceled billions in energy grants to states "based solely" on politics -- and whether that state was represented by Democrats and backed Harris in 2024. www.nytimes.com/2026/07/24/b...

Trump Administration Admits Canceling Grants to States That Did Not Vote for Him

Federal officials said in court documents that they halted billions of dollars in funding for energy projects to states “based solely” on whether they backed President Trump in the 2024 election.

nytimes.com