Constant Fractal

@nfb42.bsky.social

Fan of reading, writing, gaming and all that!

Beginning to feel like I need to budget a week on the blog for a military primer on 'how the US Navy is the load-bearing pillar of your ability to eat bananas and of folks in developing countries to eat at all.' Not saying that is an optimal situation, merely that it is the situation.

The problem is that as we're seeing with the Strait of Hormuz, "the USA forfeits its global ambitions" does not lead to a new age of peace and sunshine, but to global recession and instability. The Strait of Hormuz is not the only load-bearing instance of US power backstopping modern economies.

@tupolev22m.bsky.social · 10h ago

I think the traditional answer is actually "forfeit your global ambitions because you can't afford them and voters won't make the sacrifices necessary to restore them," unfortunately

For the curious, the term for 'clever trick in war' is a 'strategem' and multiple ancient writers wrote books listing them, most notably Frontinus and Polyaenus, whose works are both titled Strategemata ('Strategems'). Read those, pick one that fits the situation and go for it.

To add on to the history here. Much of the "bioweapons panic" comes out of 1990s testimonials after the fall of the Soviet Union. In the aftermath, many in the West (not least in the National Security establishment and the prestige journalist space) went looking for the next big scary thing.

Calliope@calliope5431.bsky.social · 3d ago

The breathless coverage is almost more insulting than the book itself, including a *New Yorker* article which cheerfully talks about the doomsday scenario of "smallpox bacteria" (it's a virus) being spliced with other pathogens, and the "horror" of a 2019 fire at VECTOR (which did nothing).

Last piece of the vicious cycle: it is in the far right parties' interest that these kinds of events happen again & again. These parties live off a (perceived) immigration crisis, and their political incentives are to ensure crises happen, even when orchestrated by Europe's adversaries.

I think this is key, and so much modern media discourse fails because it lets the right-wing get away with obfuscating the difference between severity and consistency, which is just the educational expression of the distinction between authoritarianism and rule of law.

Nathan@nwylabour.bsky.social · 3d ago

My general view, and there are many teachers who share this view, is that the *consistency* of the behaviour policy is far more important than its severity. And consistency matters day to day for individual teachers, but also across the whole school. Senior leaders have to maintain it.

I don’t really want to get into this with people who feel this way, but i don’t think this is a good thing! We don’t need to behave this way! It’s not healthy to approach academic discourse as an exercise in harshness!

Screenshot of a post that reads “It's incredible is how little folks understand about academe. Peer review is brutal. Academic Q+A is Troy level slaughter. Bros attacking a lady academic for a fair review would shit themselves on stage after a paper and break down into toddler tears after their first conference paper w a mean Q+A.
12:35 PM • Aug 1, 2026 ® Everybody can reply
12 reposts 5 quotes 75 likes 1 save”

i am mostly not interested in etymology as a source of secret meaning, which i consider faux intellectual nonsense in the majority of cases, but what i definitely do like to know is when people start to need words for what things and concepts

humans aren't naturally particularly good or bad. the great labor of each of our lives is to *make* ourselves good, and help the people around us do the same so that someday together we can build a better world. Being awful to random people online constantly just drags you & the world the other way

@gigercat.bsky.social · 6d ago

contrary to what much of this site believes, your actions (in addition to, and more than your intent) matter and will modify who you are. treating people online like shit will eventually make you a worse person IRL. in order to be good you have to practice at being good.

it’s never a great sign for your society when all the competent people who believe in doing a good job for the sake of it conclude that they’re actively being punished for these qualities, while malignantly stupid criminals are making bank

as a kid i imagined the typical CEO as being this cigar-chomping man in a pinstripe suit yelling "get those numbers up, no excuses" actually so many of them are just fad-chasing losers

your apartment, the sport of basketball, and the Republic of Korea are all social constructs. mere recognition of this fact does not actually make the question of whether you are standing in your own apartment, playing basketball, or a Korean national up in the air until settled by op ed editors

(8) I tend to imagine ressourcement more in terms of “what if we read Origen and this helped free us from the bonds of Neo-Scholasticism?” (Origen is not worried about it, he’s before that, but we are.) (9) I’m not sure I saw sincerity as an instrument for such transformations. But it works. Fin.

so the question is: who will be in charge of the right-wing now? and the answer seems to be: the fascists you might've called the 80s and 2000s right "fascists," but you were wrong. these people are very different in ways that will become readily aparent.