cpw

@voxcpw.bsky.social

🇨🇦🍁Occasionally a modder of Minecraft. I love trains. He/him

Oh hey, yep, basically same conclusions we came to. Like even if you're willing to write off the ethical stuff, there's a bunch of super boring business reasons to not go anywhere near it. Including "it appears to erode your abilities even if you're aware of that risk going in." That's uh. Um. No.

Daniel Fedor@dcfedor.bsky.social · 2w ago

Blue Bottle Games, as a policy, does not use generative AI. It's something we've discussed as a team, weighing the pros and cons, and ultimately, we decided it was not for us. Recently, while chatting with a colleague, she mentioned it was useful hearing our reasoning. So: Sharing time! 1/12

Here's something I post from time to time. My answer to a reader who asked me: what could journalists do NOW to break with some of their more corrosive habits.

Bild

"why does the UK change leaders so often?" there are diminishing returns wrt how long each vessel can house thatcher's spirit. by the end of the century we'll be getting through 1000 prime ministers a day

I see people arguing that anti-car stuff mostly comes from people without kids, and I’d just say; 1. It is, obviously, easier to get around without a car if you don’t have kids. 2. The reasons for that are mostly policy choices, and if we can change policy to fix those things.

For that matter, I think “anti-car” is bad framing. I am pro-mass transit and pro-smarter urban design. No one thinks everyone should or could ditch their car tomorrow without any other changes. The point is that we should make it easier and better to get around the places we live.

There are lots of ideas like congestion pricing or pedestrianizing streets that people say they’re opposed to, but when they’re implemented lots of people change their minds because they see how much better things can be when we don’t start with the premise “everyone should be stuck in traffic”.