Mishka

@mishkaa.bsky.social

Tolerating gerontocracy, housing theory of everything understander, abundant housing, abundant transit. Also computer and math stuff

My latest column for @newscientist.com subscribers and for library users is about what exactly a quantum field is and how physicists arrived at needing them! ⚛️🧪 "a quantum field determines how many particles can be created or destroyed at each point in space." Enjoy!

Why do particle physicists like spending time in fields?

The concept of a field plays a key role in particle physics, but what exactly is it? From its origins in the study of magnetism to the quantum fields of today, columnist Chanda Prescod-Weinstein goes ...

newscientist.com

Like a basic one to me that you see a lot online is when there is a new development in California someone says in the comments “Ugh more rentals? There are so few homeownership opportunities in the city! Why do devs only want to build rentals?” Not knowing that this is a policy choice we’ve made.

Urban Land Rent 🇸🇴🚰@urbanlandrent.bsky.social · 3mo ago

I think liberals/progressives tend to attribute (bad) outcomes to the inevitability of market logic but I think this assumes markets are more static and less influenced by legal structures than they are. Like “profits” and “investment” and “prices” are not set in stone.

An underrated addendum to the Bowling Alone story is that North America's largest bowling operator (Bowlero) is a publicly traded company whose business model involves buying mom and pop alleys, shutting down the leagues, and trying to attract casual, higher paying, one-off players.

Bild

1. Here’s a thread on #NIMBY (“not in my backyard”) and the challenges of change in cities: First off, although it might feel that way, NIMBY isn’t unique to your city, and it’s (probably) not worse in your city than anywhere else. It’s also not surprising, since it’s largely about human nature.

the whole Rae Huang bit is strange to me Nithya is the most progressive member of the city council who knocked off an incumbent in 2020 and won by an even bigger margin in 2024 (despite her district being gerrymandered against her) LA doesn’t need a “community organizer” longshot left candidate!

So much of the opposition to “new” things in cities (eg bike lanes, townhomes) comes down to “X doesn’t work for me, so we shouldn’t build that.” Why that gut reaction? Pure selfishness? Or a wrong impression that we all need/want the same thing? Or what else?