Neq

@nequals001.bsky.social

theignorantschoolmaster.substack.com

People know that "I" shaped entities lie, confabulate, misremember, pass on shoddy information, etc. Whereas we have to constantly remind them that books and news reports and encyclopedias lie too, and you want to make the thing you characterize as a lie machine MORE LIKE A BOOK TO PEOPLE?

I feel like the big question hanging over the math stuff is: if OpenAI put their LLM on a few thousand problems, and it solved "only" a few hundred of them, would Navier-Stokes-esque brute force have solved the rest? Or is the model for some reason just not capable of solving all of them?

Over the last decade, there were two hypotheses: H1: the political right genuinely cared about threats to speech from the left. H2: they were using campus speech wars to impose their values and silence dissent. Today, the answer is clear, but I can't find any of the H1 people admitting their error.

Adam Serwer@adamserwer.bsky.social · yesterday

After years of championing "free speech," Texas lawmakers have enabled a dramatic rise of censorship in Texas universities, banning concepts, canceling courses and closing departments seen as "woke," and even using AI bots as censors. All in the name of freedom. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/1...

In other professors’ syllabi, the bot flagged the Pulitzer Prize–winning play Angels in America by Tony Kushner, essays by the Mexican American MacArthur genius grant recipient Sandra Cisneros, and materials related to a class about the Holocaust (that professor was told to drop material regarding Nazi persecution of LGBTQ people).

Putting aside the ideological slant of the new rules, the bot, like many large language models, seems to “hallucinate,” or make mistakes. The AAUP lawsuit lists texts banned for their “sex-based ecofeminist framework” and “gendered ecofeminist frameworks.” These phrases might sound persuasively like academese, but the academics behind the lawsuit had never heard of them; these concepts “do not exist,” the complaint says. Matthew Pehl, a history professor at Tech, told me that he knew several people who’d received reports from the system that were “plainly written by an AI that had hallucinated content or confused content from one class to another.”

"that's nice, ive been playing mario but it's set in my home town and all the npcs are made of deepfakes of ppl i knew in high school that i had grok look up on facebook. princess peach is this one crush i never got over. the porn scenes are very tasteful imo"

i think it's probably not great that most computer programs people use at this point are primarily oriented toward capturing as much human attention as possible

About yourself specifically, it seems you hold some opinions. One is that you are important overall anyway. Another opinion is identity.

Visualising the distribution of substrings in the genomes of different organisms. Going up to depth eight by recursively splitting into quadrants, we get these fractal-like pictures.

how do we deal with abundance? how can we deal with abundance in a way that we would like? i am starting to feel that one of the ways in which a government can allow us the pursuit of happiness, is to prevent things which remove our slack.