Dr Ieithydd (Carys)

@yrieithydd.bsky.social

Christian, Tertiary (TSSF), Verger, ASNC PhD, linguist,

Since 1284, the wealth of Wales has been used to enrich English oligarchs, leaving Wales in poverty. And you can see the legacy today: six of the ten poorest boroughs in Britain are in South Wales - and all of them are places that generated massive wealth.

The more I consider it, the more I think vaccines are a strong contender for 'the best thing humanity has ever done'. I always feel quite excited and emotional seeing the tiny vulnerable being I've been entrusted with caring for, getting immunity to things with the potential to randomly kill them

Are cis people paying attention to what Andy Burnham is doing to trans people or are you still too excited over his message of 'hope'? Like, today. Do you see what has happened *today*?

...the inciting incident, the first incursion of the unknown and the uncanny in the children's lives. But also that of the readers - a child in 1950 would, even if not an evacuee themselves, be extremely familiar with the concept, and with the imaginative space opened up by the thought of being...

...1990s, and how this fundamentally alters the work. I'm willing to reserve judgment on the film, they might make that time-shift work. But I've seen people (again, exclusively Americans) arguing that WW2 isn't a significant part of TLTW&TW because it's "only one sentence", that it's a means to...

I saw a short video on the internet a while back where a lady said AI was actually very useful for her for writing emails, she said whenever she had to write an email and felt blocked she remembered other people use AI to do the same thing and suddenly she could write the email powered by spite.

Economist (and legend) Ann Pettifor wants us to bring back the biblical sin of usury. Listen to her explain, in her talk this year, how interest on debts means Brazil is forced to “strip the rainforest and degrade the land”. Our whole talks archive is free to explore. Listen via our website or app.

Many of us need to own up to the fact that we ✨don't listen✨. I still hear the rare whisper asking when "the pastor" made the decision that we were not going to have a vote. My siblings in Christ, I updated you in painstaking detail at every council meeting for two years.

No one's really upset about it in my context; we're fine. But it is absolutely true in churches that you can put it in the bulletin, say it out loud weekly, hire a sky-writer, and text everybody... and 25+% of the congregation was "never told about it"

With my regulator hat on: - some of those words wouldn't be commonly known to someone under 30, because they've rightfully dropped out of use - meaning they might not spot them as what they are - they do this for sexist terms too (IMO 'slag' and 'slapper' way more offensive than the gen pub say)

Somebody said "They voted for racism and got poverty" The thing is... social scientists and economists have been saying for the last 50 years Racism is austerity

Is trying to fathom logic of someone voting 1st preference a priest under oversight of Bishop of Ebbsfleet (no women for "headship" reasons) & 2nd* for a female priest standing for greater inclusion *technically it could have been 3rd but then 2nd would have been a female priest born in Pakistan

To recap: if you wear tight clothes you’re a whore; baggy clothes you’re fat and ugly. If you do a class targeted to women it doesn’t count (Pilates, spinning); if you try to use the weight machines you’re taking something from men. If you don’t know how to do something you’re stupid. What else?

What I've gathered from having to unfollow many fitness accounts over the Gillis thing is that men wearing clothes that show muscles they've gained as a result of a lot of hard work is Good and women wearing clothes that show muscles they've gained as a result of a lot of hard work is Bad and Slutty

On what *which* people find offensive? People in general or people in the target groups for these offensive words? Sometimes it's entirely expected for government to hold itself to a higher standard than the man on the Clapham omnibus.