Cruiser Destroyer & Typhon Frigate Enthusiast

@scb250.bsky.social

He/Him | Late 20s

AI is effective for knowledge work and yeah basically all jobs are going to be managing it, I think you're going to see a lot of outsourcing because business process outsourcers are going to be able to use AI to do a lot of the heavy lifting in a way that it may not make sense for SME to do.

Materialist Gnostic@walmsley.bsky.social · 2h ago

thinking about the nightmare future where AI *is* effective for knowledge work and that *doesn't* destroy all the jobs but but *does* turn every job in to purely managerial and strategy-alignment work because implementation becomes free

thinking about the nightmare future where AI *is* effective for knowledge work and that *doesn't* destroy all the jobs but but *does* turn every job in to purely managerial and strategy-alignment work because implementation becomes free

Genuinely driving me insane to see even well intentioned fans of ai not mentioning the various hydra heads of this issue at all — high schoolers sharing deepfaked nudes of classmates, nudify sites, an icloud nude leak quantity of fake salacious photos generated probably each month

Is this just going to become the unacknowledged dirty little secret of video-gen AI, the same way social media companies knew that right wing accounts tended to break moderation rules more? The dominant use of this technology being “imagine if this person couldnt refuse you”?

Gregk Foley@gregk.co.uk · 3mo ago

Not being funny but if you can’t connect our current moment of resurgent and revanchist violent misogyny driven in part by a deeply embittered Silicon Valley oligarchy to even a ‘well-intentioned’ filmmaker just casually saying, “Imagine, you could fuck an infamously objectified dead woman,” then,

Well, as David said, under current guidance they'd have to have separate cubicled sinks too, and that's very expensive and time-consuming to implement for an existing business that doesn't already have that setup.

Honestly suspect the de facto safest option will just be for providers to basically play dumb: just go "yeah, use whichever one you want" and then if anyone complains abt someone using the "wrong" toilet, just go "Oh, well we can't really do anything about it now, they'll be done in a minute".

really glad we've got clarity with all this new guidance in the uk but um. like. hypothetically speaking. what are you meant to do if you forgot what sex they assigned you at birth. it was like a really really long time ago and everything,

This doesn't even entail liking the movie or praising Nolan as a genius, it's just is a bad idea and also decidedly ungracious to put out not just one, but several articles brutally savaging a work that passionately tried to capture the beauty and power of the work you devoted your life to.

When in your life is there ever going to be this much public fascination and investment in a story so ancient and fundamental? There is an audience out there which is primed to hear more about this and find a whole new interest in it who are seeing you mock a passionate adaptation as slop for rubes.

I'm sorry, I know academics who specialize in Homer probably watched it with a laundry list of grievances, but if I scroll through youtube Shorts right now I can find people making the kind of memes and skits about a 2800 year old epic that Breaking Bad produced at its peak popularity.

If the academy gets pulled into coming out swinging against the biggest adaptation of Homer in probably a couple generations off the back of one prominent scholar deciding to be Reviewer 2 to Nolan's work, it will say, IMO, pretty damning things about academia's ability to foster public engagement.