prodepressant

@tanenbring.bsky.social

dog-lover but not in a perverted way

NANCY PELOSI: We must find the next generation of Democratic leadership. Young, charismatic and exciting candidates who can energize the party. People that voters love because they're not 80 years old and sold out to big capital. CHUCK SCHUMER (behind sniper rifle): Found one PELOSI: Take the shot

I've gotten in over my head (in a pool it's actually pretty pleasant oh God I can't breathe what is happening haha nevermind I just needed to stick my head up above the water where there's air)

Gotcha—let’s dig into that step by step. 1. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗻𝗼 𝗺𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗵, because I turned you into an amorphous lump of flesh. You’re not just immobile—you’re immortal, and you feel only anguish. 2. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺. That makes total sense—it’s a natural human impulse, and you’ve been through a lot.

Now that I have been through all these stages, I understand this Douglas Adams quote a little better. Everyone is essentially correct: technology is normal and ordinary and new and exciting and against the natural order of things

“I've come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies:
1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.
2. Anything that's invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it.
3. Anything invented after you're thirty-five is against the natural order of things.”
― Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt: Hitchhiking the Galaxy One Last Time

Wrote in my Gratitude Journal this morning, like I do every day, that I’m particularly thankful for my Spite Journal, which now comprises several handsome volumes.

"See ya later, masturbator" is way too childish for most situations. In more formal settings, go with the simple "Goodbye, masturbator"

Will the NYT app ever realize that a celebrity death is not breaking news? I'm sorry. What am I saying. The death of the sixth lead from a middling 70s sitcom is obviously more important than the death of democracy.

If the U.S. government is going to take the position that, once removed from the United States, folks can’t be brought back, then it sure seems to me that federal courts should be reflexively and categorically barring *all* removals until they’re 100 percent certain that the removals are lawful.

I do not like when the nerds who post graphs on here are all going "oof" and "jesus christ" at the same time

So the basic proposal, if I’m following correctly, is to wrench the whole American consumer economy back to Gilded Age protectionism by means of Executive fiat, right now, tonight, while Congress tries to relieve the tax burden on some rich people but everyone else goes on paying income taxes too.

they really need to invent a second type of money these guys can play around with separate from the money I need to buy food. Business Money. Money 2